← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Alexis Sampson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.12
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1339
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.32
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.3698
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

0%
NCAA D1W
2%
NCAA D3W
98%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2018-19 Fargo Davies High USHS-W 26 19 22 41 1.577 0.1339 0.1339
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2021-22 Concordia MIAC SO 6 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Concordia MIAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Lydia Passolt USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG 0.095 Bemidji State
Vilma Tanskanen SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG 0.182 North Dakota
Amanda Bäckebo SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG 0.056 Syracuse
Carly Bullock USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG 0.812 Princeton
Emily Antony USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG 0.444 Minnesota State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Cara Cook 2022-23 · 1.12 PPG 0.333 Aurora NCHA
Amber Meluzio 2024-25 · 0.79 PPG 0.464 Elmira UCHC
Shelby Evans 2024-25 · 0.89 PPG St. Scholastica NCHA
Ashley Schintz 2016-17 · 1.00 PPG 0.370 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC
Elena Gualtieri 2014-15 · 0.37 PPG 1.000 Connecticut College NESCAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.