icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Barrington High (IL) | USHS-W | 22 | 28 | 16 | 44 | 2.000 | 0.5822 | 0.6091 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Northeastern | D1 | HEA-W | — | 38 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.263 |
| 2017-18 | Northeastern | D1 | HEA-W | — | 37 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.135 |
| 2016-17 | Northeastern | D1 | HEA-W | — | 34 | 1 | 16 | 17 | 0.500 |
| 2015-16 | Northeastern | D1 | HEA-W | — | 36 | 3 | 12 | 15 | 0.417 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.