icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Choate | NE-Prep-Girls | 22 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.320 | 0.1472 | 0.1472 | — | — |
| 2010-11 | Choate | NE-Prep-Girls | 13 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 1.230 | 0.5659 | 0.5659 | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Choate | NE-Prep-Girls | 8 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 2.000 | 0.9202 | 0.9202 | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Choate | NE-Prep-Girls | 26 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 1.040 | 0.4785 | 0.4785 | — | — |
| 2019-20 | Boston Pride | PHF | 24 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.292 | — | — | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Boston Pride | PHF | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC-W | — | 29 | 2 | 13 | 15 | 0.517 |
| 2015-16 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC-W | — | 32 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 0.375 |
| 2013-14 | Harvard | D1 | ECAC-W | — | 31 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.258 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.