IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shauna Bollinger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Chippewa Falls/Menomonie USHS-W 22 23 13 36 1.636 0.4921 0.4921 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SR 27 4 7 11 0.407
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 28 8 4 12 0.429
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 29 4 6 10 0.345
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 NCHA FR 28 8 1 9 0.321
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2012-13 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
-23.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#749
Forward overall
#256
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emma Nuutinen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kaleigh Martinson
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lauren Maras
Franklin Pierce · 2022-23
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zsofia Pazmandi
Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.