← New Search ↗ Social Card

Katie Stueve Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-08-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Downingtown High East USHS-W 16 19 16 35 2.188 0.6368 0.6875
2012-13 Downingtown High East USHS-W 17 24 11 35 2.059 0.5993 0.6221
2013-14 Downingtown High East USHS-W 16 40 4 44 2.750 0.8005 0.7906
2014-15 Downingtown High East USHS-W 14 18 7 25 1.786 0.5198 0.4884
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA SR 32 10 12 22 0.688
2017-18 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA JR 32 10 12 22 0.688
2016-17 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA SO 31 10 8 18 0.581
2015-16 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA FR 29 13 15 28 0.966
2014-15 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA 23 3 4 7 0.304
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.67
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2014-15 · Sacred Heart
-54.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#318
Forward overall
#24
Forward born in 1997
#86
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.17 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota ·
1.073 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
North Dakota ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.