IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rebecca Lindblad Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 New Trier High USHS-W 28 10 16 26 0.929 0.2703 0.2703 — —
2012-13 New Trier High USHS-W 13 4 10 14 1.077 0.3135 0.3135 — —
2013-14 New Trier High USHS-W 7 5 5 10 1.429 0.4159 0.4159 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 UConn D1 — — 36 1 6 7 0.194
2017-18 UConn D1 HEA-W JR 39 3 4 7 0.179
2016-17 UConn D1 HEA-W SO 36 4 6 10 0.278
2015-16 UConn D1 HEA-W FR 35 1 1 2 0.057
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2015-16 · UConn
-82.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2115
Forward overall
#746
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Rooney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Darby Dodds
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.52 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Corbin Boyd
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Hespenheide
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dana Rasmussen
Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Rooney
RPI ·
0.219 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Darby Dodds
Lindenwood ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.