IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ivy Dynek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 New Trier High USHS-W 13 17 8 25 1.923 0.5598 0.5598 — —
2013-14 New Trier High USHS-W 9 14 2 16 1.778 0.5175 0.5175 — —
2014-15 New Trier High USHS-W 11 16 5 21 1.909 0.5557 0.5557 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W SR 32 1 0 1 0.031
2017-18 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W JR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W SO 34 2 2 4 0.118
2015-16 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W FR 20 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#465
Forward overall
#139
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Annie Roche
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG
Saana Valkama
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelly Pannek
Minnesota ·
1.073 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicole Schammel
Minnesota State ·
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Annie Roche
Colgate ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.