IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Karin Knapp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-10-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Hayward High USHS-W 23 2 4 6 0.261 0.0785 0.0822 — —
2013-14 Hayward High USHS-W 23 1 1 2 0.087 0.0262 0.0261 — —
2014-15 Hayward High USHS-W 24 0 7 7 0.292 0.0877 0.0832 — —
2015-16 Hayward High USHS-W 24 1 6 7 0.292 0.0877 0.0784 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#3986
Defenseman overall
#315
Defenseman born in 1997
#3380
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Kelsey Crow
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tristen Truax
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jessica Adolfsson
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.06 PPG
→ Penn State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Emma Turbyville
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Jackson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amanda Smythe
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.105 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Talon Berlando
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Julie Barlow
Concordia Wisconsin · 2024-25
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.