IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Arianna Kosakowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-05-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Winchendon NE-Prep-Girls 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.2301 0.2301 — —
2012-13 Winchendon NE-Prep-Girls 26 0 7 7 0.270 0.1242 0.1242 — —
2013-14 The Winchendon School USHS-W 37 14 23 37 1.000 0.2911 0.2832 — —
2014-15 Winchendon NE-Prep-Girls 24 1 1 2 0.080 0.0368 0.0368 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Union D1 ECAC-W SR 33 4 8 12 0.364
2017-18 Union D1 ECAC-W JR 34 5 11 16 0.471
2016-17 Union D1 ECAC-W SO 34 2 4 6 0.176
2015-16 Union D1 ECAC-W FR 34 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#586
Defenseman overall
#117
Defenseman born in 1997
#216
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Serena Sommerfield
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Boston College
0.04 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brinna Dochniak
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ RIT (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bowlby
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Heather Olson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Xylia Lang
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Serena Sommerfield
Boston College ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brinna Dochniak
RIT ·
0.111 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Grace Bowlby
Wisconsin ·
0.316 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.