← New Search ↗ Social Card

Clair DeGeorge Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-06-07 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
PWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 58 24 38 62 1.069 0.3112 0.3200
2015-16 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 61 22 46 68 1.115 0.3245 0.3160
2016-17 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 57 33 49 82 1.439 0.4188 0.3878
2024-25 Montréal Victoire PWHL 26 0 2 2 0.077
2025-26 PWHL 26 0 2 2 0.077
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W 38 16 30 46 1.210
2020-21 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W JR 20 5 7 12 0.600
2019-20 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W SO 35 7 15 22 0.629
2018-19 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W FR 36 9 13 22 0.611
2017-18 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W FR 36 9 13 22 0.611
2016-17 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W 37 7 16 23 0.622
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2016-17 · Bemidji State
+128.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1403
Forward overall
#75
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.43 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindenwood ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.