← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maureen Murphy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-12-15 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Montréal Victoire · PWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 58 18 17 35 0.603 0.1756 0.1852
2015-16 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 61 33 23 56 0.918 0.2672 0.2672
2016-17 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 55 48 43 91 1.655 0.4816 0.4586
2024-25 Montréal Victoire PWHL 28 3 3 6 0.214
2025-26 Montréal Victoire PWHL 21 4 3 7 0.333
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Northeastern D1 HEA-W GR 33 20 35 55 1.667
2021-22 Northeastern D1 HEA-W SR 37 30 26 56 1.514
2020-21 Northeastern D1 HEA-W JR 16 7 11 18 1.125
2019-20 Providence D1 HEA-W JR 11 7 4 11 1.000
2018-19 Providence D1 HEA-W SO 37 22 21 43 1.162
2017-18 Providence D1 HEA-W FR 36 19 9 28 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2017-18 · Providence
+137.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1565
Forward overall
#84
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bemidji State ·
0.371 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.