← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hannah Bilka Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-24 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Seattle Torrent · PWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 60 38 40 78 1.300 0.3784 0.3844
2018-19 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 46 26 39 65 1.413 0.4113 0.3861
2024-25 Boston Fleet PWHL 16 5 6 11 0.688
2025-26 Seattle Torrent PWHL 14 4 5 9 0.643
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W 39 22 26 48 1.231
2022-23 Boston College D1 HEA-W SR 34 12 29 41 1.206
2021-22 Boston College D1 HEA-W JR 34 16 17 33 0.971
2020-21 Boston College D1 HEA-W SO 19 7 9 16 0.842
2019-20 Boston College D1 HEA-W FR 34 14 23 37 1.088
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.09
2019-20 · Boston College
+229.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1183
Forward overall
#52
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.43 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Cloud State ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindenwood ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.