IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sharon Frankel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Kingswood Oxford NE-Prep-Girls 7 0 1 1 0.140 0.0644 0.0644 — —
2011-12 Kingswood Oxford NE-Prep-Girls 20 2 15 17 0.850 0.3911 0.3911 — —
2012-13 Kingswood Oxford NE-Prep-Girls 19 0 1 1 0.050 0.0230 0.0230 — —
2013-14 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep-Girls 22 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep-Girls 23 1 0 1 0.040 0.0184 0.0184 — —
2015-16 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep-Girls 27 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 The Loomis Chaffee School USHS-W 26 21 22 43 1.654 0.4814 0.4814 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Princeton D1 ECAC-W SR 33 3 10 13 0.394
2020-21 Princeton D1 ECAC-W JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Princeton D1 ECAC-W SO 32 9 15 24 0.750
2018-19 Princeton D1 ECAC-W FR 33 4 12 16 0.485
2017-18 Princeton D1 ECAC-W FR 32 5 5 10 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2017-18 · Princeton
+23.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3470
Forward overall

D1 Comparables

Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emma Nuutinen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dana Rasmussen
Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Emma Nuutinen
North Dakota ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Reagan Haley
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.