IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Madison Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Bismarck Blizzard USHS-W 25 17 23 40 1.600 0.4658 0.5205 — —
2019-20 Bismarck Blizzard USHS-W 26 31 37 68 2.615 0.7613 0.7613 — —
2020-21 Andover High USHS-MN-W 23 18 17 35 1.522 0.2444 0.2444 — —
2021-22 Andover High USHS-MN-W 30 25 36 61 2.033 0.3265 0.3054 — —
2022-23 Andover High USHS-MN-W 20 18 22 40 2.000 0.3212 0.2851 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W JR 36 5 14 19 0.528
2024-25 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W SO 36 10 11 21 0.583
2023-24 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W FR 37 6 8 14 0.378
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2023-24 · St. Thomas
+50.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2003
Forward overall
#76
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Casey Leveillee
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paige Voight
Merrimack ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Leveillee
Vermont ·
0.265 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mariah Gardner
Minnesota ·
0.071 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.