IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlotte Wensley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Berwick NE-Prep-Girls 23 1 3 4 0.170 0.0782 0.0782 — —
2018-19 Berwick Academy USHS-W 31 12 12 24 0.774 0.2254 0.2615 — —
2019-20 Berwick NE-Prep-Girls 30 12 12 24 0.800 0.3681 0.3681 — —
2022-23 St. Paul's NE-Prep-Girls 29 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 St. Paul's NE-Prep-Girls 27 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RPI D1 ECAC-W — 33 8 7 15 0.455
2024-25 RPI D1 ECAC-W — 25 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9016
Forward overall
#372
Forward born in 2005
#618
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Natasia Burzynski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Providence (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brittany Wheeler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.26 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Caroline Murphy
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Yale (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Natasia Burzynski
Providence ·
0.030 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brittany Wheeler
Yale ·
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
North Dakota ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.