← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lola Reid Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-06-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 45 16 6 22 0.489 0.1423 0.1423
2020-21 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 31 15 13 28 0.903 0.2629 0.2629
2021-22 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 44 31 17 48 1.091 0.3176 0.3341
2022-23 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 47 31 16 47 1.000 0.2911 0.2881
2023-24 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 57 36 11 47 0.825 0.2400 0.2231
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston University D1 HEA-W SO 34 2 1 3 0.088
2024-25 Boston University D1 HEA-W FR 37 8 6 14 0.378
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2024-25 · Boston University
+77.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2436
Forward overall
#88
Forward born in 2006
#883
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Princeton (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Providence (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota ·
0.071 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Princeton ·
0.103 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brown ·
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.