IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kennedy Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 60 15 24 39 0.650 0.2332 0.2332 — —
2020-21 Northwood School USHS-W 25 10 16 26 1.040 0.3027 0.3027 — —
2021-22 Northwood School USHS-W 62 37 43 80 1.290 0.3756 0.3424 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC-W SR 35 6 8 14 0.400
2024-25 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC-W JR 39 9 8 17 0.436
2023-24 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC-W SO 39 5 0 5 0.128
2022-23 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC-W FR 39 2 7 9 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2022-23 · St. Lawrence
-21.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1827
Forward overall
#66
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Taylor Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sylvia Marolt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
Demi Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Williamson
Minnesota ·
0.395 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sylvia Marolt
Bemidji State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Demi Gardner
Minnesota ·
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.