Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Stanstead College Varsity (W) | CAHS-W | 60 | 15 | 24 | 39 | 0.650 | 0.2332 | 0.2332 |
| 2020-21 | Northwood School | NE-Prep-Girls | 25 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 1.040 | 0.3378 | 0.3378 |
| 2021-22 | Northwood School | NE-Prep-Girls | 62 | 37 | 43 | 80 | 1.290 | 0.4191 | 0.3801 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Lawrence | ECAC-W | SR | 35 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 0.400 |
| 2024-25 | St. Lawrence | ECAC-W | JR | 39 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 0.436 |
| 2023-24 | St. Lawrence | ECAC-W | SO | 39 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.128 |
| 2022-23 | St. Lawrence | ECAC-W | FR | 39 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.231 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Katie Rooney | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG | 0.219 | RPI |
| Darby Dodds | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.52 PPG | 0.000 | Lindenwood |
| Caitlin Reilly | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.76 PPG | 0.312 | Minnesota |
| Corbin Boyd | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG | 0.269 | Minnesota State |
| Dana Rasmussen | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG | 0.167 | Ohio State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilee Anderson | 2016-17 · 1.65 PPG | 0.480 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Emma Hart | 2021-22 · 0.98 PPG | 0.808 | Alvernia | UCHC |
| Bella LaMere | 2021-22 · 1.79 PPG | 0.444 | St. Olaf | MIAC |
| Elizabeth Tabaka | 2013-14 · 1.29 PPG | 0.615 | Augsburg | MIAC |
| Taylor Thompson | 2013-14 · 0.67 PPG | 1.185 | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.