← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lexi Edwards Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 International Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 21 2 3 5 0.238 0.0382 0.0382
2013-14 International Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 6 12 18 0.783 0.1257 0.1257
2014-15 International Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 25 13 38 1.583 0.2543 0.2543
2015-16 International Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 28 27 55 2.292 0.3680 0.3680
2016-17 International Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 28 31 59 2.458 0.3948 0.3948
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA JR 9 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA SO 27 8 10 18 0.667
2017-18 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA FR 27 8 9 17 0.630
2016-17 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA 31 7 3 10 0.323
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2016-17 · Sacred Heart
+17.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1477
Forward overall
#79
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.43 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lindenwood ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.