← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vilma Tanskanen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-14 Country: Finland
Signed Professionally
Linköping HC · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Team Kuortane SMLIIGA-W 16 4 2 6 0.375 0.1422 0.1422
2012-13 Team Kuortane SMLIIGA-W 23 5 3 8 0.348 0.1319 0.1319
2013-14 Team Kuortane SMLIIGA-W 24 11 10 21 0.875 0.3318 0.3318
2014-15 SMLIIGA-W 23 6 3 9 0.391 0.1484 0.1484
2019-20 Linköping HC SDHL 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.1444 0.1444
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Mercyhurst D1 CHA-W SR 31 6 11 17 0.548
2017-18 Mercyhurst D1 CHA-W JR 33 14 13 27 0.818
2016-17 North Dakota D1 32 3 4 7 0.219
2015-16 North Dakota D1 33 4 2 6 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2015-16 · North Dakota
-4.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3849
Forward overall
#112
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Princeton ·
0.812 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bemidji State ·
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.