IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lydia Passolt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 19 10 7 17 0.895 0.1437 0.1437 — —
2013-14 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 25 18 22 40 1.600 0.2570 0.2570 — —
2014-15 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 24 35 23 58 2.417 0.3881 0.3881 — —
2015-16 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 25 34 30 64 2.560 0.4111 0.4111 — —
2016-17 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 23 22 18 40 1.739 0.2793 0.2793 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W SR 16 3 2 5 0.312
2019-20 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W JR 29 10 4 14 0.483
2018-19 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W SO 32 6 7 13 0.406
2017-18 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W FR 32 6 7 13 0.406
2016-17 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 21 1 1 2 0.095
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2016-17 · Bemidji State
-72.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1543
Forward overall
#80
Forward born in 1999
#86
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Amy Petersen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ Penn State (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Charly Dalhquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mariah Gardner
Minnesota ·
0.071 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Amy Petersen
Penn State ·
0.784 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Paige Voight
Merrimack ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.