IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rachel Herzog Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-10-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 0 5 5 0.200 0.0321 0.0321 — —
2013-14 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 24 0 3 3 0.125 0.0201 0.0201 — —
2014-15 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 4 7 11 0.440 0.0707 0.0707 — —
2015-16 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 1 12 13 0.520 0.0835 0.0835 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W SR 35 0 7 7 0.200
2018-19 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W JR 28 1 4 5 0.179
2017-18 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W SO 31 0 3 3 0.097
2016-17 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W FR 36 0 2 2 0.056
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2016-17 · St. Cloud State
-24.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4254
Defenseman overall
#313
Defenseman born in 1997
#3624
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Lauren Boyle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Brittney Anderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Emma Turbyville
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Rydland
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kelsey Crow
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lauren Boyle
Ohio State ·
0.486 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Brittney Anderson
St. Cloud State ·
0.571 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Emma Turbyville
St. Cloud State ·
0.040 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.