IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Abby Ecker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-03-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Prairie Centre High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 2 8 10 0.417 0.0669 0.0669 — —
2013-14 Prairie Centre High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 5 5 10 0.417 0.0669 0.0669 — —
2014-15 Prairie Centre High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 12 12 24 0.960 0.1542 0.1542 — —
2015-16 Prairie Centre High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 7 15 22 0.957 0.1536 0.1536 — —
2016-17 Prairie Centre High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 17 10 27 1.080 0.1734 0.1734 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 20 1 2 3 0.150
2019-20 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 30 0 2 2 0.067
2018-19 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 36 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 36 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#1363
Defenseman overall
#188
Defenseman born in 1999
#988
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kate Hallett
Harvard ·
0.100 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Robinson
Minnesota ·
0.129 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
Wisconsin ·
0.350 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.