IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sadie Peart Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-09-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Grand Rapids-Greenway USHS-MN-W 25 6 13 19 0.760 0.1221 0.1221 — —
2014-15 Grand Rapids-Greenway USHS-MN-W 25 8 21 29 1.160 0.1863 0.1863 — —
2015-16 Grand Rapids-Greenway USHS-MN-W 25 13 20 33 1.320 0.2120 0.2120 — —
2016-17 Grand Rapids-Greenway USHS-MN-W 25 18 32 50 2.000 0.3212 0.3212 — —
2017-18 Grand Rapids-Greenway USHS-MN-W 25 23 25 48 1.920 0.3084 0.3084 — —
2018-19 Grand Rapids-Greenway USHS-MN-W 24 23 32 55 2.292 0.3680 0.3680 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W GR 37 15 16 31 0.838
2022-23 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W SR 40 14 14 28 0.700
2021-22 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W JR 39 14 19 33 0.846
2020-21 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W SO 16 5 3 8 0.500
2019-20 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W FR 37 12 12 24 0.649
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2019-20 · Quinnipiac
+120.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1631
Forward overall
#80
Forward born in 2000
#101
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Natasia Burzynski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Providence (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brittany Wheeler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.26 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Caroline Murphy
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Yale (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Natasia Burzynski
Providence ·
0.030 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brittany Wheeler
Yale ·
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
North Dakota ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.