IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sadie Lindsay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 23 4 2 6 0.261 0.0419 0.0419 — —
2017-18 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 12 14 26 1.040 0.1670 0.1670 — —
2018-19 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 24 19 43 1.720 0.2762 0.2762 — —
2019-20 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 13 15 28 1.120 0.1799 0.1799 — —
2020-21 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 19 13 11 24 1.263 0.2029 0.2029 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W GR 31 1 3 4 0.129
2024-25 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W SR 36 4 4 8 0.222
2023-24 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W JR 35 2 3 5 0.143
2022-23 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W SO 17 0 2 2 0.118
2021-22 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 8 0 2 2 0.250
2017-18 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 38 5 8 13 0.342
2016-17 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 38 3 5 8 0.211
2007-08 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 2 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 36 0 0 0 0.000
2005-06 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 41 1 1 2 0.049

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3615
Forward overall
#133
Forward born in 2003
#520
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Amy Petersen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ Penn State (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Charly Dalhquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Emily Gunderson
Lindenwood ·
0.171 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mariah Gardner
Minnesota ·
0.071 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Amy Petersen
Penn State ·
0.784 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.