← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Chloe Primerano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-01-02 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.87
Elite (0.70+)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.7870
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.93
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
1.83
Elite (1.00+)
Base D3e-W PPG1.9393
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

2%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
98%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2022-23 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 20 28 48 1.600 0.3666 0.3666
2023-24 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 29 35 54 89 3.069 0.7031 0.7031
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Minnesota WCHA-W SO 34 10 20 30 0.882
2024-25 Minnesota WCHA-W FR 35 5 26 31 0.886

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Meghan Turner NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.17 PPG 0.351 Quinnipiac

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Carly Moran 2011-12 · 2.05 PPG 1.097 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Courtney Dumont 2007-08 · 1.92 PPG 1.167 Connecticut College NESCAC
Alex Hantge 2018-19 · 1.62 PPG 1.417 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Ashlyn Abrahamson 2022-23 · 2.39 PPG 0.923 Hamline MIAC
Elizabeth Wulf 2010-11 · 4.19 PPG 0.522 Middlebury NESCAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.