Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Mississauga Hurricanes U22 | OWHL-U22 | 26 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 0.654 | 0.2290 | 0.2290 |
| 2022-23 | Mississauga Hurricanes U22 | OWHL-U22 | 37 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 0.432 | 0.1514 | 0.1514 |
| 2023-24 | Shattuck-St. Mary's 19U | 19U-AAA-W | 51 | 27 | 19 | 46 | 0.902 | 0.2871 | 0.2871 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Franklin Pierce | NEWHA | SO | 37 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 0.730 |
| 2024-25 | Franklin Pierce | NEWHA | FR | 32 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 0.500 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lindsay Roethke | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG | 0.027 | UConn |
| Liz Schepers | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG | 0.410 | Ohio State |
| Emily Bergland | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG | 0.114 | Bemidji State |
| Paige Voight | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG | 0.559 | Merrimack |
| Amy Petersen | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG | 0.784 | Penn State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emily Bill | 2022-23 · 1.62 PPG | 0.429 | St. Norbert | NCHA |
| Madison Kadrlik | 2022-23 · 1.08 PPG | 0.643 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Hayley Walsh | 2012-13 · 3.60 PPG | 0.194 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Michaela O'Connor | 2015-16 · 2.09 PPG | 0.333 | Williams | NESCAC |
| Maggie Hunter | 2022-23 · 0.75 PPG | 0.931 | Norwich | LittleEast |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.