← New Search ↗ Social Card

Addison Andre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-06-18 Country: USA Height: 5'6" (167 cm)
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Chisago Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 7 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 South St. Paul High (W) USHS-MN-W 20 3 7 10 0.500 0.0755 0.0755
2021-22 East Ridge High (women) USHS-MN-W 26 8 3 11 0.423 0.0639 0.0639
2022-23 East Ridge High (women) USHS-MN-W 27 16 19 35 1.296 0.1957 0.1957
2023-24 Roseville/Mahtomedi High USHS-MN-W 26 16 21 37 1.423 0.2149 0.2103
2024-25 Roseville/Mahtomedi High USHS-MN-W 26 15 16 31 1.192 0.1800 0.1692
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA FR 37 14 11 25 0.676
2025-26 Franklin Pierce D3 NEWHA FR 37 14 11 25 0.676
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2025-26 · Franklin Pierce
+325.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3781
Forward overall
#147
Forward born in 2007
#550
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2023-24
0.548 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.210 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2013-14
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.