← New Search ↗ Social Card

Avery Farrell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Rogers High USHS-MN-W 25 3 1 4 0.160 0.0257 0.0257
2019-20 Rogers High USHS-MN-W 24 12 18 30 1.250 0.2007 0.2007
2020-21 Rogers High USHS-MN-W 16 15 9 24 1.500 0.2409 0.2409
2021-22 Rogers High USHS-MN-W 27 18 23 41 1.518 0.2439 0.2439
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W 36 6 15 21 0.583
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W 35 6 4 10 0.286
2023-24 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W 36 7 7 14 0.389
2022-23 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA FR 34 12 15 27 0.794
2022-23 Franklin Pierce D3 FR 34 11 13 24 0.706
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2022-23 · Franklin Pierce
+492.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3160
Forward overall
#116
Forward born in 2003
#405
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Providence (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Quinnipiac ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.270 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.