IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryn Prier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Burlington Barracudas AA OWHL-U22 43 36 24 60 1.395 0.4878 0.4878 — —
2023-24 Burlington Barracudas AA OWHL-U22 42 27 57 84 2.000 0.6992 0.6992 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W — 39 7 11 18 0.462
2024-25 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W — 38 8 8 16 0.421
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.57
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2024-25 · Quinnipiac
-26.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#350
Forward overall
#5
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 4.36 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Erin Conway
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.48 PPG
→ Brown (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Average
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.50 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.73 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 4.16 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.27 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jessie Aney
UConn ·
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Erin Conway
Brown ·
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Detert
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.