← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Julia Mings Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.39
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.4557
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.91
Strong (0.65–1.00)
Base D3e-W PPG1.0606
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2016-17 Amherst/Sweet Home/Clarence USHS-W 22 33 23 56 2.546 0.2161 0.2161
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2020-21 William Smith NEHC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 William Smith NEHC SO 25 10 16 26 1.040
2018-19 William Smith NEHC FR 28 16 11 27 0.964

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Nicole Guagliardo USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG 0.156 Mercyhurst
Katie Detert USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.50 PPG 0.000 St. Cloud State
Jacqueline Kaasa USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.46 PPG 0.143 Bemidji State
Mariah Gardner USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG 0.071 Minnesota State
Abby Halluska USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG 0.314 Bemidji State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Emily Heid 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG 0.593 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC
Abigail Chamernick 2022-23 · 1.17 PPG 0.500 Hamline MIAC
Grace Karakas 2023-24 · 1.38 PPG 0.417 SUNY Cortland SUNYAC
Tia Lascelle 2021-22 · 0.67 PPG 0.893 Adrian NCHA
Jenna Curtis 2013-14 · 2.68 PPG 0.222 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.