← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lily Geist Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 25 5 1 6 0.240 0.0385 0.0385
2019-20 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 25 10 7 17 0.680 0.1092 0.1092
2020-21 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 19 16 10 26 1.368 0.2198 0.2198
2021-22 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 27 14 27 41 1.518 0.2439 0.2439
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stonehill D1 NEWHA SR 37 4 14 18 0.486
2024-25 Stonehill D1 NEWHA JR 38 7 4 11 0.289
2023-24 Stonehill D1 NEWHA SO 39 10 8 18 0.462
2022-23 Stonehill D1 NEWHA FR 37 12 7 19 0.513
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.51
2022-23 · Stonehill
+271.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3781
Forward overall
#164
Forward born in 2004
#558
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Providence (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Quinnipiac ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.270 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.