← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ellah Hause Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 23 0 4 4 0.174 0.0279 0.0279
2019-20 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 6 10 16 0.640 0.1028 0.1028
2020-21 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 17 4 12 16 0.941 0.1512 0.1512
2021-22 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 26 11 18 29 1.115 0.1791 0.1791
2022-23 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 23 19 25 44 1.913 0.3072 0.3072
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W JR 36 5 11 16 0.444
2024-25 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W SO 36 1 10 11 0.306
2023-24 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W FR 37 5 6 11 0.297
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2023-24 · St. Thomas
+23.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#666
Defenseman overall
#114
Defenseman born in 2005
#418
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Yale (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG
→ RIT (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

North Dakota ·
0.257 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Dartmouth ·
0.208 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Yale ·
0.207 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.