IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kendra Distad Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Burnsville High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 3 7 10 0.400 0.0642 0.0642 — —
2019-20 Burnsville High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 5 4 9 0.360 0.0578 0.0578 — —
2020-21 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 11 13 24 1.044 0.1676 0.1676 — —
2021-22 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 31 20 15 35 1.129 0.1813 0.1813 — —
2022-23 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 26 15 15 30 1.154 0.1853 0.1853 — —
2023-24 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 28 21 27 48 1.714 0.2753 0.2514 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W SO 39 10 5 15 0.385
2024-25 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W FR 24 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3326
Forward overall
#126
Forward born in 2006
#448
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Kiki Radke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brooke Madsen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG
→ Penn State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Lydia Passolt
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.60 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kiki Radke
Bemidji State ·
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.270 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sydney Brodt
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.