← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sophie McKinley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-11-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Pursuit of Excellence CSSHL-U18W 28 7 8 15 0.536 0.1227 0.1227
2019-20 Pursuit of Excellence CSSHL-U18W 10 2 5 7 0.700 0.1604 0.1604
2020-21 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 7 1 1 2 0.286 0.0655 0.0655
2021-22 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 26 5 26 31 1.192 0.2732 0.2732
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst D1 CHA-W 36 8 6 14 0.389
2024-25 Merrimack D1 HEA-W 34 4 5 9 0.265
2023-24 Merrimack D1 HEA-W 36 7 7 14 0.389
2022-23 Merrimack D1 HEA-W 36 3 5 8 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2022-23 · Merrimack
+21.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 39 comparables)

3%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
97%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3847
Forward overall
#167
Forward born in 2004
#77
in CSSHL-U18W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.67 PPG
→ Penn State
0.27 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lindenwood ·
0.171 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
North Dakota ·
0.241 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.