IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jenna Raunio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-09-24 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
HV71 · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 HV71 SDHL 22 0 1 1 0.045 0.0526 0.0526 — —
2021-22 HV71 SDHL 34 6 8 14 0.412 0.4756 0.4756 — —
2022-23 HV71 SDHL 24 3 7 10 0.417 0.4813 0.4813 — —
2023-24 HV71 SDHL 16 0 8 8 0.500 0.5775 0.5775 — —
2024-25 HV71 SDHL 33 5 11 16 0.485 0.5599 0.5599 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W — 26 1 13 14 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.58
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2025-26 · Ohio State
-7.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 34 comparables)

26%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
74%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#62
Defenseman overall
#16
Defenseman born in 2006
#154
in SDHL

D1 Comparables

Kendra Nealey
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG
→ Cornell (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.62 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Briana Mastel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Meghan Turner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.17 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Heidi Niskanen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.19 PPG
→ RPI
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kendra Nealey
Cornell ·
0.212 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Briana Mastel
Harvard ·
0.258 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Meghan Turner
Quinnipiac ·
0.351 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.