← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Jenna Raunio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-09-24 Country: Sweden
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.56
Strong (0.45–0.70)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.5477
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.87
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
1.11
Elite (1.00+)
Base D3e-W PPG1.1725
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

52%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
48%
Club / Other

Based on 21 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2020-21 HV71 SDHL 22 0 1 1 0.045 0.0532 0.0532
2021-22 HV71 SDHL 34 6 8 14 0.412 0.4816 0.4816
2022-23 HV71 SDHL 24 3 7 10 0.417 0.4873 0.4873
2023-24 HV71 SDHL 16 0 8 8 0.500 0.5847 0.5847
2024-25 HV71 SDHL 33 5 11 16 0.485 0.5670 0.5670
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Ohio State WCHA-W FR 26 1 13 14 0.538

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Meghan Turner NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.17 PPG 0.351 Quinnipiac
Heidi Niskanen SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.19 PPG 0.000 RPI

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Tristan Wicklund 2021-22 · 1.23 PPG 0.871 St. Norbert NCHA
Madison Davis 2016-17 · 1.12 PPG 0.962 Hamline MIAC
Kelsey Rafferty 2012-13 · 1.57 PPG 0.680 Hamline MIAC
Megan Lyke 2016-17 · 1.08 PPG 1.000 Lake Forest NCHA
Emma Crocker 2016-17 · 1.38 PPG 0.769 Elmira UCHC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.