← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reghan Chadwick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Kingston Jr. Ice Wolves OWHL-U22 28 14 12 26 0.929 0.3246 0.3246
2022-23 Kingston Jr. Ice Wolves OWHL-U22 37 8 14 22 0.595 0.2079 0.2079
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 College of the Holy Cross D1 NEWHA 35 7 6 13 0.371
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 NEWHA JR 35 7 6 13 0.371
2024-25 College of the Holy Cross D1 NEWHA 30 6 5 11 0.367
2024-25 Holy Cross D1 NEWHA SO 30 6 5 11 0.367
2023-24 College of the Holy Cross D1 NEWHA 30 5 6 11 0.367
2023-24 Holy Cross D1 NEWHA FR 30 5 6 11 0.367
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2023-24 · College of the Holy Cross
+68.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2721
Forward overall
#88
Forward born in 2005
#123
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Princeton (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brown ·
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.