IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Makayla Moran Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-10-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Apple Valley High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 15 21 36 1.500 0.2409 0.2409 — —
2020-21 Apple Valley High (women) USHS-MN-W 21 29 17 46 2.191 0.3518 0.3518 — —
2021-22 Apple Valley High (women) USHS-MN-W 26 32 30 62 2.385 0.3830 0.3830 — —
2022-23 Apple Valley High (women) USHS-MN-W 27 43 21 64 2.370 0.3807 0.3807 — —
2023-24 Apple Valley High (women) USHS-MN-W 28 38 29 67 2.393 0.3843 0.3633 — —
2024-25 Apple Valley High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 38 24 62 2.480 0.3983 0.3612 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 38 4 9 13 0.342
2025-26 Minnesota State D1 CHA-W FR 38 4 9 13 0.342
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2025-26 · Minnesota
+10.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1227
Forward overall
#45
Forward born in 2006
#49
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.26 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Caroline Murphy
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Yale (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.22 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.21 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Natasia Burzynski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Providence (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brooklynn Schugel
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.270 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Caroline Murphy
Yale ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
Minnesota ·
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.