icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Elk River/Zimmerman (women) | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.083 | 0.0134 | 0.0134 | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Elk River/Zimmerman (women) | USHS-MN-W | 19 | 1 | 11 | 12 | 0.632 | 0.1014 | 0.1014 | — | — |
| 2021-22 | Elk River/Zimmerman (women) | USHS-MN-W | 28 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 0.571 | 0.0918 | 0.0918 | — | — |
| 2022-23 | Proctor/Hermantown High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 30 | 6 | 16 | 22 | 0.733 | 0.1178 | 0.1178 | — | — |
| 2023-24 | Proctor/Hermantown High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 31 | 7 | 19 | 26 | 0.839 | 0.1347 | 0.1347 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Sacred Heart | D1 | NEWHA | — | 35 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 0.257 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.