IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Avery Bairos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-09-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Saskatoon Stars SFMAAAHL-W 30 19 10 29 0.967 0.2261 0.2261 — —
2022-23 Saskatoon Stars SFMAAAHL-W 30 25 21 46 1.533 0.3586 0.3586 — —
2023-24 Saskatoon Stars SFMAAAHL-W 24 22 15 37 1.542 0.3606 0.3606 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W — 40 4 5 9 0.225
2024-25 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W — 18 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1728
Forward overall
#64
Forward born in 2006
#8
in SFMAAAHL-W

D1 Comparables

Caroline Murphy
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Yale (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.26 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.22 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.21 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.20 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Caroline Murphy
Yale ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.270 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
Minnesota ·
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.