IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Siiri Yrjölä Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-09-08 Country: Finland
Signed Professionally
HIFK · SMLIIGA-W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 HIFK SMLIIGA-W 27 5 10 15 0.556 0.2107 0.2107 — —
2021-22 HIFK SMLIIGA-W 29 1 9 10 0.345 0.1307 0.1307 — —
2022-23 HIFK SMLIIGA-W 31 16 26 42 1.355 0.5137 0.5137 — —
2023-24 HIFK SMLIIGA-W 27 5 28 33 1.222 0.4635 0.4635 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W — 31 1 8 9 0.290
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W — 32 2 3 5 0.156
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.46
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2024-25 · St. Cloud State
-65.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#151
Defenseman overall
#35
Defenseman born in 2004
#51
in SMLIIGA-W

D1 Comparables

Briana Mastel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Anna Wright
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Marchin
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Yale (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Kelly
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Meghan Turner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.17 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Briana Mastel
Harvard ·
0.258 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Wright
Maine ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Marchin
Yale ·
0.207 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.