Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Breck School (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 11 | 20 | 31 | 1.240 | 0.1872 | 0.1872 |
| 2020-21 | Edina High | USHS-MN-W | 21 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 0.809 | 0.1222 | 0.1222 |
| 2021-22 | Edina High | USHS-MN-W | 30 | 21 | 20 | 41 | 1.367 | 0.2064 | 0.2064 |
| 2022-23 | Edina High | USHS-MN-W | 30 | 19 | 27 | 46 | 1.533 | 0.2315 | 0.2315 |
| 2023-24 | Edina High | USHS-MN-W | 31 | 28 | 29 | 57 | 1.839 | 0.2776 | 0.2776 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Wisconsin | WCHA-W | SO | 40 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.200 |
| 2024-25 | Wisconsin | WCHA-W | FR | 40 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 0.300 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Schepers | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG | 0.410 | Ohio State |
| Paige Voight | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG | 0.559 | Merrimack |
| Amy Petersen | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG | 0.784 | Penn State |
| Mariah Gardner | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG | 0.071 | Minnesota State |
| Lindsay Roethke | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG | 0.027 | UConn |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marta Mazzocchi | 2022-23 · 0.90 PPG | 0.727 | Trinity | NESCAC |
| Megan O'Brian | 2011-12 · 1.24 PPG | 0.542 | Bethel | MIAC |
| Jayde Pederson | 2017-18 · 1.68 PPG | — | Finlandia | NCHA |
| Grace Orr | 2022-23 · 1.68 PPG | — | New England College | LittleEast |
| Siobhan Claugherty | 2017-18 · 1.48 PPG | 0.455 | Hamline | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.