IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kiley Mastel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Winchendon NE-Prep-Girls 28 5 2 7 0.250 0.1150 0.1150 — —
2018-19 Winchendon NE-Prep-Girls 29 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC-W SR 35 6 0 6 0.171
2024-25 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC-W JR 39 2 2 4 0.103
2023-24 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC-W SO 38 1 2 3 0.079
2022-23 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC-W FR 36 7 4 11 0.306
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2022-23 · St. Lawrence
+210.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11974
Forward overall
#906
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Sierra Semmel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Maine
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kippin Keller
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Suvi Ollikainen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Janna Haeg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kendall Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ Colgate
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sierra Semmel
Maine ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kippin Keller
Minnesota ·
0.056 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Suvi Ollikainen
St. Cloud State ·
0.151 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.