← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anna Jerylo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Mahtomedi High USHS-MN-W 25 2 8 10 0.400 0.0604 0.0604
2019-20 Mahtomedi High USHS-MN-W 25 4 9 13 0.520 0.0785 0.0785
2021-22 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 28 3 10 13 0.464 0.0701 0.0701
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA 34 3 3 6 0.176
2025-26 St. Michael's College D3 JR 34 3 3 6 0.176
2024-25 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA 33 3 3 6 0.182
2024-25 St. Michael's College D3 SO 29 3 3 6 0.207
2023-24 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA 36 0 5 5 0.139
2023-24 St. Michael's College D3 FR 24 0 1 1 0.042
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2023-24 · St. Michael's College
+145.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9813
Forward overall
#417
Forward born in 2005
#3125
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Yale (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota Duluth ·
0.069 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.897 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.