← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Lucie Tenenbaum Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-04-21 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.14
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1431
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.32
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.3375
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

8%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
92%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2022-23 16U-AAA-W 31 7 4 11 0.355 0.1267 0.1267
2023-24 19U-AAA-W 33 2 6 8 0.242 0.0995 0.0995
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Minnesota State CHA-W FR 37 1 5 6 0.162

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Cheyenne Harris USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG 0.324 Union
Taylor Turnquist USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG 0.171 Clarkson
Briana Jorde USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG 0.077 Bemidji State
Amanda Kimmerle USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG 0.059 RPI
Megan Hinze USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG 0.182 Minnesota State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Allie LeClaire 2023-24 · 0.79 PPG 0.333 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Olivia Patnode 2022-23 · 0.63 PPG Saint Mary's MIAC
Tallulah Bryant 2022-23 · 1.00 PPG 0.273 Lake Forest NCHA
Jess Eykyn 2023-24 · 1.88 PPG 0.136 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Anna Rausch 2024-25 · 0.86 PPG 0.312 St. Norbert NCHA

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.