IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Haley Maxwell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-08-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Edina High USHS-MN-W 25 1 6 7 0.280 0.0450 0.0450 — —
2019-20 Edina High USHS-MN-W 25 1 10 11 0.440 0.0707 0.0707 — —
2020-21 Edina High USHS-MN-W 21 1 7 8 0.381 0.0612 0.0612 — —
2021-22 Edina High USHS-MN-W 30 4 13 17 0.567 0.0910 0.0910 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W SR 34 0 5 5 0.147
2024-25 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W JR 36 0 7 7 0.194
2023-24 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W SO 37 2 5 7 0.189
2022-23 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W FR 36 2 5 7 0.194
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2022-23 · St. Thomas
+183.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3697
Defenseman overall
#424
Defenseman born in 2003
#3055
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Mckenzie Revering
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
McKenna Wesloh
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Olson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Rydland
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Amanda Kimmerle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ RPI (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mckenzie Revering
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.059 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
McKenna Wesloh
Ohio State ·
0.273 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrea Olson
Merrimack ·
0.056 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.