Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Edina High | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.280 | 0.0423 | 0.0423 |
| 2019-20 | Edina High | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 1 | 10 | 11 | 0.440 | 0.0664 | 0.0664 |
| 2020-21 | Edina High | USHS-MN-W | 21 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0.381 | 0.0575 | 0.0575 |
| 2021-22 | Edina High | USHS-MN-W | 30 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 0.567 | 0.0856 | 0.0856 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Thomas | CHA-W | SR | 34 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.147 |
| 2024-25 | St. Thomas | CHA-W | JR | 36 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.194 |
| 2023-24 | St. Thomas | CHA-W | SO | 37 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.189 |
| 2022-23 | St. Thomas | CHA-W | FR | 36 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.194 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mckenzie Revering | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG | 0.059 | Minnesota Duluth |
| McKenna Wesloh | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG | 0.273 | Ohio State |
| Arianna Kosakowski | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG | 0.000 | Union |
| Andrea Olson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG | 0.056 | Merrimack |
| Kate Rydland | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG | 0.161 | Penn State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audrey McClurg | 2024-25 · 0.52 PPG | — | Concordia | MIAC |
| Bea Palmer | 2024-25 · 0.83 PPG | 0.250 | Bowdoin | NESCAC |
| Eva Nelson | 2023-24 · 0.52 PPG | 0.393 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Aubree McDonagh | 2023-24 · 0.59 PPG | 0.360 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Autumn Burt | 2023-24 · 0.50 PPG | — | St. Catherine | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.