IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rhaea Flint Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Central York Panthers OWHL-U22 40 3 6 9 0.225 0.0787 0.0787 — —
2024-25 Central York Panthers OWHL-U22 37 4 4 8 0.216 0.0756 0.0756 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lindenwood D1 WCHA-W — 37 0 5 5 0.135
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2025-26 · Lindenwood
+86.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3697
Defenseman overall
#683
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Kelsey Crow
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tristen Truax
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jessica Adolfsson
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.06 PPG
→ Penn State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Jackson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Emma Turbyville
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelsey Crow
Penn State ·
0.160 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Tristen Truax
Minnesota ·
0.167 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessica Adolfsson
Penn State ·
0.343 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.