IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Campbell Heger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Gentry Academy (women) USHS-MN-W 22 6 4 10 0.455 0.0730 0.0730 — —
2021-22 Gentry Academy (women) USHS-MN-W 31 7 6 13 0.419 0.0674 0.0674 — —
2022-23 Gentry Academy (women) USHS-MN-W 27 10 12 22 0.815 0.1309 0.1309 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA — 28 2 2 4 0.143
2024-25 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA — 27 2 0 2 0.074
2023-24 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA — 8 0 1 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2023-24 · Sacred Heart
+38.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8142
Forward overall
#347
Forward born in 2005
#2305
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Vilma Tanskanen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Amanda Bäckebo
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Syracuse (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tianna Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Holly Dietzler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jessica Bonfe
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vilma Tanskanen
North Dakota ·
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Amanda Bäckebo
Syracuse ·
0.056 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tianna Gunderson
Minnesota ·
0.069 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.