← New Search ↗ Social Card

Avery Chesek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Eastview High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 3 5 8 0.320 0.0514 0.0514
2018-19 Eastview High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 14 13 27 1.125 0.1807 0.1807
2019-20 Eastview High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 28 12 40 1.667 0.2677 0.2677
2020-21 Eastview High (women) USHS-MN-W 23 22 14 36 1.565 0.2514 0.2514
2021-22 Eastview High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 23 22 45 1.800 0.2891 0.2891
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Yale D1 ECAC-W SR 31 1 3 4 0.129
2024-25 Yale D1 ECAC-W JR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Yale D1 ECAC-W SO 18 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Yale D1 ECAC-W FR 12 1 2 3 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2022-23 · Yale
+18.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2454
Forward overall
#101
Forward born in 2004
#252
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ Penn State (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vermont ·
0.265 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Merrimack ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.