IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gia Mancy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-11-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Philadelphia Jr Flyers 19U 19U-AAA-W 36 7 9 16 0.444 0.1535 0.1535 — —
2023-24 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 54 6 11 17 0.315 0.0916 0.0916 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Union D1 ECAC-W — 29 0 4 4 0.138
2024-25 Union D1 ECAC-W — 29 0 1 1 0.035
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.03
2024-25 · Union
-68.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2301
Defenseman overall
#329
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Mckenzie Revering
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
McKenna Wesloh
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Olson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Rydland
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.54 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Amanda Kimmerle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ RPI (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mckenzie Revering
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.059 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
McKenna Wesloh
Ohio State ·
0.273 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrea Olson
Merrimack ·
0.056 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.