IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ruby Rauk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-10-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 9 11 20 0.909 0.1460 0.1460 — —
2022-23 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 30 10 13 23 0.767 0.1231 0.1231 — —
2023-24 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 31 9 20 29 0.935 0.1502 0.1502 — —
2024-25 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 28 23 18 41 1.464 0.2352 0.2352 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W — 32 2 0 2 0.062
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2025-26 · Quinnipiac
-63.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4411
Forward overall
#179
Forward born in 2006
#781
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Sara Hjalmarsson
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Providence (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sara Hjalmarsson
Providence ·
0.657 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Danielle Marmer
Quinnipiac ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mariah Gardner
Minnesota ·
0.071 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.